British Waterways shock to our Licence Fee!
Continuous cruisers (boats that have no home mooring)
That’s us.. According to BW we are bracketed along with another 1,359 other continuous cruisers whose Licence fees will be rising by a massive 127% over the next two years. No that isnt a typo, up 127%. That is just under 2.5 TIMES the amount we are paying at the moment! 
British Waterways have decided that 1,360 boats without a ‘home mooring’ are using and abusing the system more than those who do have one. We cause more maintenance, more wash, more damage to locks..
1. These boats also have a higher intensity of use. BW’s 2004 boat owners’ survey
indicated that they cruise on average for 177 days per year, which is significantly
more than that of a hire boat. The case for the higher rate is therefore strong on
cost impact grounds.2. In terms of willingness to pay, there is evidence from the same survey that the
typical household income of continuous cruisers is significantly lower than that of
boaters with home moorings and this might suggest a lower ability to pay. On the
other hand, since the boat is frequently the primary residence, the licence fee is a
component of housing cost and as such, likely to be subject to different price
considerations. In particular, an individual’s willingness to pay for housing is
generally substantially higher his willingness to pay for leisure boating
This bit is from the Proposal Document
Of course we probably do cruise more days than a hire boat, well we would.. but we probably average less than 2 hours a day moving on the waterways, I haven’t worked it out yet. We cause no wash as we travel so slowly, and no damage to locks, banks etc, so are very cost effective on BW Maintenance budgets. As a plus, being on the waterways all the time, we are extra eyes and ears for BW phoning in problems if we see them..
There are arguments going on all over the internet on newsgroups and websites, I am not one for expressing an opinion then get abused so I won’t be joining in.. but I have made contact with an action group called The Continuous Cruisers Action Group and phoned them on 07985 005 478 where I spoke to a lady called Sarah who has asked me to write to BW as well as use the form. She has also asked me to spread the word, by phone, snail mail, email, websites… anything… so I am 
Sue
Updated 23rd January 2012


October 10th, 2010 at 4:55 pm
Hello Sue,
I whole-heartedly agree with you on this subject but out of interest how long ago did you post this blog? I’ve tried to find out more about The Continuous Cruisers Action Group but to no avail. Do you have a website?
Regards,
Richard
October 10th, 2010 at 11:13 pm
Gosh Richard, you have found a post there!
That was back in July 2005.. It is a pity when you find one of my blogs that the date is not on there. I shall have to see if I can find some sort of add on for the software so that dates are shown.
Well in the end they dropped their proposals into the canal!… For now!
It did cause some rift between Continuous Cruisers and those that pay for moorings at the time.
All seems to have settled down again now, however with the Government about to scrap BW and reduce the grant available to whoever is going to run the system, I have a feeling that we may be targetted again.
They are going to have to get some money from somewhere, and I fear the Licence will rocket!
October 10th, 2010 at 11:16 pm
Oh as for the Continuous Cruisers Action Group, I think that has now disbanded… until the next time!
October 14th, 2010 at 7:23 am
Thanks for that Sue,
I only asked because it seemed very relevant to the way things are shaping up at the moment. I have a feeling that, if BW are subject to big changes today, the new bosses will be the same as the old bosses! (as the song goes).